Saturday, February 21, 2015

Co-Teaching with Student Teachers

By Terry Funk
CA 
DelColle, J. & Keenan, C. (2014). Co-Teaching partnerships for excellence in the age of accountability: A preliminary study of the effects of co-teaching in student teaching” (2015). NERA Conference Proceedings 2014. Paper 5. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera_2014/5

Summary: This article reports the findings from a pilot study in New Jersey at Richard Stockton College and sets the stage for continued research on Co-teaching with student teachers and host/master teachers. Traditionally, student teachers in New Jersey complete a third semester in a take-over model (in which they teach a class for 14 weeks by themselves). With the current State and National accountability standards emphasis on student test scores and the use of those scores to determine teacher performance, classroom teachers have been reluctant to have student teachers take over their classes. With this model the student teacher is an apprentice rather than peer of the master teacher. The master teacher makes explicit the workings of the classroom in an ongoing dialog, providing guidance and encouragement. In the present study, a control group of 32 students were assigned the traditional take-over model while the experimental group consisted of 15 students in the Co-teaching model. Host teachers in the experimental group had initial training about co-teaching and the option to complete an additional 3 unit Coaching and Mentoring graduate course tuition free. Measures were taken by survey, observation evaluation of host teacher (4 formative, 1 summative), and supervisors. Additionally in the experimental group, elementary reading scores and middle and high school teacher grades were collected. Similarities and differences between the groups were documented. Modest to significant gains for the experimental group included self-reported satisfaction levels among Co-teaching pairs, learning gains of varying magnitudes among students, degree of professionalism observed by supervisors, and host teacher growth.


Evaluation: The article is particularly important in a time when schools are challenged to increase the quality of their clinical partnerships. Student teaching experience is one of the most critical parts of teacher preparation and is where theory meets practice. As a retired special educator, I have some reservations about tying student grades to teacher performance. Indeed, some of the neediest children may not even be graded on State tests and if they are, then they are automatically considered performing below standard, even when they are making progress. To attract very qualified teachers to underperforming students is a challenge too. Aside from the politics, Co-teaching may be better for all concerned, including special needs students. There were limitations in this pilot that are being worked out in subsequent studies with new and better design/instruments. If research can show that students are performing well with this model then master teachers will be less anxious about State assessments and better partners in clinical practice.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Peer Review Article

By Terry Funk 
CA

Alabi, J. & Weare, Jr., W. H.  (2014). Peer review of teaching. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(2), 180-191.

Summary: This article is helpful to academic librarians who engage in instruction but may lack a teaching background. The authors have presented a review of the literature and best practices in peer review to help individuals improve in teaching.  A formal program is not necessary to start an informal process using key ideas in this article. Recommendations include: establishing trust, respect, and confidentiality; choosing a suitable partner; crucial communication during pre-observation, observation and post-observation; determining focus; making time and being ready for criticism.


Evaluation: This is a recent review of the literature done in 2014 with a narrowly defined focus on formative peer evaluations. It is both informative and succinct, detailing successful practices that can be tailored to one’s situation. The article is chock full of references and tools (documents and forms) to use for peer evaluation. 

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

The Relationship Between Constructivism, Discovery and Experiential Learning

Marlonsson, Snow

ET

Splan, R. K., Porr, C. S., & Broyles, T. W. (2011). Undergraduate Research in Agriculture: Constructivism and the Scholarship of Discovery. Journal Of Agricultural Education52(4), 56-64.

Splan, Porr & Broyles (2011) describe experiential learning and constructivism as aligned. Their relationship is that constructivism is concerned with the underlying epidemiological aspect of knowing/ discovering. Experiential learning is the process by which minds engage in constructionism. Further, discovery is the link between these two ideas; experiences spark discoveries that provide the information for knowledge construction. The authors convey the importance of authentic, student led learning that is active and led by social facilitation. This article investigates the role of experiential learning prevalent in University-level agriculture programs to the mind’s ability to construct knowledge through discovery. Specifically, the article explores ways to use constructionism in undergraduate research.

       
Marlonsson, Snow
IL
Chant, R. H., Moes, R., & Ross, M. (2009). Curriculum Construction and Teacher Empowerment: Supporting Invitational Education with a Creative Problem Solving Model. Journal Of Invitational Theory And Practice1555-67.

Chant, Moes and Ross (2009) advocate combining the Creative Problem Solving Model with the Invitational Education model to foster teacher-creativity to blunt the effects of copious standardized testing. They assert that it is administration’s role to design a curriculum thus so that teachers can exercise the freedom to delve deeper into some content despite pressure to teach to the test. The paper outlines a case study of this model at the elementary level. The goals of the study were to shift students’ work products from individualistic/ product-oriented tasks to process-focused collaborative endeavors using inviting processes characterized by trust, optimism, care, respect and intentionality.

This article solidly illustrates its premises by referring to the case study. The ideas represent another way to break away from bird units and add complexity to lessons.
The references used to support the research were consistently old, which raises some concern about the accuracy of the brain and psychology-related research referenced in the article.   


Steve Hargadon, Director of the Web 2.0 Labs and Host of the Future of Education Podcast

Porter, Lea

DiNardo, N., (2014, September 25). Steve Hargadon, Director of the Web 2.0 Labs and Host of the Future of Education Podcast, Podcast retrieved from http://meeteducationproject.com/2014/09/25/steve-hargadon/

This podcast is an interview with Steve Hargadon concerning his Mindshift article Escaping the Education Matrix. In this 46 minute interview, Mr. Hargadon talks about his belief that the education system is all about control  and that society uses to the education system for control. He discusses that we can reclaim education, but that it will take a commitment similar to the civil rights movement. Mr. Hargadon believes that students should be allowed to drive their own education and that true "prosperity comes from individual creativity, hard work, and people working together". He also believes that individuals should be allowed to be in charge of their own education.

This podcast and the Mr. Hargadon's Mindshift article  are both very relevant to this class in regards to blended learning, co-construction of knowledge, and encouraging students to be inquirers. 

Anytime, Anywhere Learning

Porter, Lea

Ray, M. (2014). Anytime, anywhere learning. School Library Journal, 60(3), 20. 

This brief article discusses why online teaching and learning are important skill sets for all 21st-century information professionals in the age of blended learning.  This is not only important for university level professionals but K-12 level teacher librarians as well. By utilizing platforms like Edmodo, Canvas, and Blackboard while at the same time curating high-quality digital resource collections, teacher librarians can become “online learning engineers and blended learning baristas”. The author of this article points out that teacher librarians are exactly the person to help teachers implement blended learning environments while instructing students how to be effective digital citizens and successful online collaborators.

As a K-12 teacher librarian, I see this article being used as an advocacy piece to share with district administrators in regards to 21st-century learning opportunities. While the article is brief, the author points to a needed growth area in the K-12 arena. 

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Alejandro Aravena: My architectural philosophy? Bring the community into the process

Sullivan, M.
CO

Ted Talk: Alejandro Aravena: My architectural philosophy? Bring the Community into the Process
October 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.ted.com/talks/alejandro_aravena_my_architectural_philosophy_bring_the_community_into_the_process?utm_source=newsletter_daily&utm_campaign=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_content=image__2014-11-06#t-118950

Summary: Chilean architect Alejandro Aravena shares how participatory community planning helped pose questions to address design challenges regarding low-income housing, sustainability and protection against natural disasters. He shares how the communities concerns around each situation helped them ask the right question to help them solve the problem. In one case, they developed half of a good house (40 sq. meters) instead of a too small housing project. In another, they flipped the design to repel radiation while still access natural light and encourage collaboration. In yet another, they used nature to diffuse and support naturals processes.

Evaluation: This is a wonderful metaphor for the messy process that collaboration can be, but how necessary to actually get to the right problem. I loved hearing how they arrived at a solution directly related to the needs of the community, whom had they not consulted would never have been  able to identify those needs. As a result, the stakeholders were involved and satisfied with the result, the design constraints were met, and the outcome truly innovative and graceful.