Besich, Lauren
Raising
the bar; education. (2013, Jun 15). The Economist, 407, 30. Retrieved
from http://search.proquest.com.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/docview/1368124428?accountid=10361
ET
Summary
This article published in The Economist explains in basic terms
the relationship between federal and state governments in relation to state
standards. Until the recent adoption of
the Common Core State Standards, each state set their own standards that
determined student proficiency of Math and English skills, however, if states
failed to produced students who didn’t measure up to national standards, they
were punished. In efforts to bridge this
gap, the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School
Officers have pushed to implement Common Core State Standards in Math and
English. So far, 45 states have agreed
to adopt these “more rigorous” standards, which will ideally streamline the
education of students in those states.
The article covers some complaints from both ends of the political
spectrum, but the main question still stands:
Will tougher standards produce smarter students?
Evaluation
This article helped me to better
understand the reasoning behind the push for Common Core Standards. The National Centre for Educational
statistics (NCES), which is a federal body, saw a discrepancy between what states
deem “proficient,” and what states deem “proficient.” Obviously that is a problem, so the
government wants to fix the problem. As
with any government-led initiative to solve a problem, there are critics. I believe we will only see how well Common
Core works after an entire generation of students passes through the education
system with these new standards, which is quite a while down the road.
No comments:
Post a Comment