Jennifer
Brickey
CA—Curriculum
and Assessment
Fensterwald,
J. (2013). API will soon lost its clout as
shorthand for defining school
success.
Retrieved from
http://edsource.org/today/2013/api-will-soon-lose-its-clout-as-shorthand-for-defining-school-success/40620#.UpuWUqWx18s
Fensterwald
explains how for more than a decade the Academic Performance Index (API) has
served as the primary measurement that determines a school’s success. This
measurement, which is based solely on standardized test scores, has been a
major determinate for parents to judge whether or not a school is best for
their children. For schools, API drives curriculum and, consequently, the money
that often supports the various programs in place. However, with the transition
to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) API’s usefulness and appropriateness
has come into question. “As a result, for the first time since API was created
in 1999, the State Board is likely to vote to suspend it next year” (Fensterwald,
2013). Discussion has also swirled around suspending API for even longer
depending on the CCSS implementation.
Although
this piece was helpful in gaining an understanding for what will happen
regarding API, I found that it raised more questions than provided answers. The
document addresses other means of measurement such as graduation rate. Yet,
there is an overall assumption policymakers profess---that everything a student
learns can be measured. States like New York have begun institutionalizing the
new Smarter Balance assessments and with it have experienced a backlash from
educators and parents, which
suggests
we need to reevaluate just how we measure students’ success.
No comments:
Post a Comment