Chambers, Julia
Ertmer, P.A. & Newby, T.J.
(2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features
from an instructional design perspective. Performance
Improvement Quarterly 26(2), p. 43-71. DOI: 10.1002/piq.21143
This is an article update of a
piece that was published in 1993 describing the three dominant learning
theories at the time: behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. The article
offers excellent descriptions of each theory. Behaviorism is characterized by learning
through repetition and the emphasis is on designing materials that provide
practice for students at progressive levels. It relies on standards,
assessments, and a system of rewards and punishments to mark achievements.
Cognitivism is a theory that stresses complex thinking and promotes mental processing.
The goal is to transfer knowledge from teacher to student to the extent that
students can apply that knowledge to new situations. Practice is the key
component of learning. Constructivism holds that learning is achieved through
direct experiences and it’s the predominant theory educational theory today. Memorization
is not emphasized; success is measured by how well students can apply past
experiential knowledge to new situations. The authors also mention that Connectivism
is an emerging theory in response to technology. In this theory, students learn
primarily through interactions and conversation with others. The idea is that
knowledge doesn’t need to be stored in the brain, but students must now know
how to access, process, organize, and interpret information (stored in
computers) as the needs arise.
Evaluation: I found this to be a
solid article for background information on the main theories of education past
and present in the U.S. The authors talk a bit about how educational theory can
and should be used to influence instructional design. They conclude that all
theories should continue to be used based on the students’ particular learning
styles and the tasks they are to master.
ET-Constructivism and Behaviorism
No comments:
Post a Comment